🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several notable changes:

• Every squad includes just 8 real players, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by human gamers grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Only two locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, the playlist lives up to its title: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for players looking for alternative ways to enjoy the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Support

"People want real players. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," states a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," says a different user. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this game," and someone else details all the issues they believe to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, real players keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this title 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Input

Despite the support, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have pointed out that it will make queue times even longer for other modes due to the sheer number of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, some areas often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was promised to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that was removed when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base compromising in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this mode as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to change it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

Should the development team has proven anything so far with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, should analytics indicates this recent mode isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.